How to Find LinkedIn Decision Makers: Company-First vs Person-First Research
Finding LinkedIn decision makers is easy. Finding the RIGHT decision maker at QUALIFIED companies is hard. Learn why company-first research produces 3x better response rates.
Emily

How to Find LinkedIn Decision Makers: Company-First vs Person-First Research
Finding decision makers on LinkedIn isn't difficult. Search "VP Marketing," get 10,000 results, start sending connection requests.
The problem: Most of those VPs work at companies you shouldn't be contacting anyway—wrong size, wrong industry, inactive, or not hiring.
The result: 5-10% response rates, wasted personalization effort, unpredictable pipeline.
Better approach: Qualify companies FIRST, then identify decision makers at those qualified companies only.
The result: 30-50% response rates, efficient personalization, predictable pipeline.
This guide shows you the company-first framework for finding decision makers at businesses actually worth contacting.
Why Person-First LinkedIn Research Fails
Standard LinkedIn prospecting works like this:
Step 1: Search for job titles ("Director of Marketing")
Step 2: Send connection requests to everyone with that title
Step 3: Wait for responses
Step 4: Discover most contacts work at wrong companies
Problems with this approach:
No company qualification: You're contacting VPs at 2-person startups, 10,000-person enterprises, and dormant companies—all mixed together.
Context-free outreach: You don't know what the company does, whether they're growing, or if your offer is relevant.
Wasted personalization: You spend time customizing messages for people at unqualified companies.
High rejection rate: Decision makers at wrong companies reject you (correctly) because the fit is poor.
Low response rate: 5-10% typical, because 90% of contacts are at companies that aren't good fits.
The Company-First Framework
Better workflow:
Step 1: Research and qualify 20 companies using company pages
Step 2: Score companies based on size, activity, hiring, industry fit
Step 3: Select top 8 qualified companies
Step 4: Identify decision makers at those 8 companies only
Step 5: Research individual's role and recent activity
Step 6: Send targeted outreach with company context
Why this works better:
Company pre-qualified: You already know they're the right size, industry, and stage.
Context available: You understand company priorities, challenges, and recent developments.
Efficient personalization: Only customizing for qualified company contacts, not random VPs.
Higher relevance: Your message references company context, not just individual's role.
Better response rate: 30-50% typical, because you're targeting right people at right companies.
What Company-First Qualification Looks Like
Before finding ANY individuals, qualify companies using these signals:
Company Size Fit
Check employee count on LinkedIn:
For most B2B tools/services:
- Sweet spot: 10-100 employees
- Too small: Under 5 (budget constraints)
- Too large: 500+ (enterprise procurement, gatekeepers)
Match company size to your offer:
- $5K-$20K services → 10-50 employees
- $20K-$100K services → 50-200 employees
- $100K+ services → 200+ employees
Hiring Activity
Check Jobs tab on company page:
Strong signal:
- 5+ open positions
- Multiple departments hiring
- Roles posted within past 30 days
- Growth-stage positions (not replacements)
Weak signal:
- No open positions
- Only replacement roles
- Jobs posted 6+ months ago
- Single department hiring only
Why this matters: Hiring companies have budget and are in growth mode. Non-hiring companies may be cost-cutting.
Recent Company Activity
Check company feed:
Active company:
- Posts within past 7 days
- Regular content schedule
- Employee engagement on posts
- Company updates about growth/launches
Inactive company:
- No posts in 90+ days
- Sporadic posting
- No employee engagement
- Stale content only
Active companies monitor LinkedIn → see your outreach faster.
Complete vs Minimal Profile
Complete profile signals investment:
- Detailed "About" section
- Specialties listed
- Locations filled out
- Cover image and logo professional
- Website link works
Minimal profile suggests:
- Not investing in online presence
- May not monitor LinkedIn regularly
- Lower response probability
Employee Profile Quality
Click "People" tab and check:
Good sign:
- Employees have complete profiles with photos
- Multiple employees list same company
- Recent hires visible
- Org chart appears legitimate
Red flag:
- Employees have bare-minimum profiles
- Inconsistent company names
- No recent hires
- Suspicious or fake-looking profiles
Only THEN: Finding Decision Makers at Qualified Companies
Once you've qualified 8-10 companies, find decision makers:
Step 1: Navigate to Company Page
Go to qualified company's LinkedIn page.
Step 2: Click "People" Tab
Shows all employees at that company on LinkedIn.
Step 3: Use Search and Filters
Search for decision-maker titles:
- "Director" (finds all director-level)
- "VP" (finds vice presidents)
- "Head of" (finds department heads)
- "Chief" (finds C-level)
Or search by department:
- "Marketing" (shows marketing team)
- "Sales" (shows sales team)
- "Operations" (shows ops team)
Step 4: Identify Actual Decision Maker (Not Just Title)
Verify authority by checking:
Profile indicators:
- How long in current role (6+ months suggests stability)
- Previous roles show progression to leadership
- Posts about strategy or budget decisions
- Manages team (mentions direct reports or team size)
Activity indicators:
- Posts within past 30 days
- Engages with company content
- Shares industry insights
- Comments on relevant topics
Red flags:
- New to role (under 3 months—still learning)
- Title doesn't match responsibilities in description
- Profile inactive for months
- No evidence of authority or decision-making
Step 5: Assess Reachability
Before outreach, check:
Easy to reach:
- Open to connection requests
- Posts publicly on LinkedIn
- Engages with comments
- Has featured section or contact info
Hard to reach:
- 500+ connections (selective)
- Never posts or engages
- "Open to work" off, no signals of openness
- Very senior (CEO of 1,000+ company)
Start with decision makers who show openness to connection.
Company Qualification + Decision Maker Research = Higher Response Rates
Person-First Approach Results
Process: Find 50 VPs, send outreach to all
Company qualification: None
Response rate: 5-10% (2-5 responses)
Why low: Most VPs are at wrong companies (wrong size, industry, or stage)
Company-First Approach Results
Process: Qualify 20 companies, find decision makers at top 10, contact 10 people
Company qualification: All pre-qualified
Response rate: 30-50% (3-5 responses)
Why higher: Same number of responses from 80% less outreach, because you're targeting right people at right companies
More responses from fewer messages = better use of time.
The 4 Types of LinkedIn Decision Makers
Not all decision makers have equal authority. Target based on deal complexity:
Type 1: Economic Buyer (Budget Authority)
Who: CFO, CEO, Business Owner, VP of Department
Authority: Can approve budget directly
Best for: High-ticket sales ($50K+), strategic initiatives
How to identify: "Budget," "P&L," "Strategy" in posts or profile
Type 2: Functional Buyer (Department Head)
Who: Director of Marketing, Head of Sales, Operations Manager
Authority: Controls department budget, influences company decisions
Best for: Department-specific tools ($10K-$50K), ongoing services
How to identify: "Leading team of X," "Managing [department]"
Type 3: Technical Buyer (Evaluator)
Who: Senior Manager, Lead roles, Technical specialists
Authority: Evaluates solutions, recommends to superiors
Best for: Complex technical sales requiring evaluation
How to identify: "Implementing," "Evaluating," "Managing [technical area]"
Type 4: End User (Champion Potential)
Who: Managers, specialists who would use your service
Authority: Can become internal champion
Best for: Building advocacy before approaching economic buyer
How to identify: Would directly benefit from your service
For simple sales: Target Type 1 or 2 directly.
For complex sales: Build relationship with Type 3 or 4 first, then go up.
LinkedIn Search Strategies That Actually Work
Strategy #1: Company-First Search
- Search for companies matching your ICP
- Filter by size, industry, location
- Review company pages
- Qualify top 10 companies
- Find decision makers at those 10 only
Time: 1-2 hours for 10 qualified contacts
Response rate: 35-50%
Strategy #2: Title + Company Size Combo
- Search "[Job Title]" (e.g., "VP Marketing")
- Apply filters: Company size (10-100), Industry (relevant), Location (target area)
- Review resulting individuals AND their companies
- Qualify both person and company before outreach
- Contact only those where both qualify
Time: 2-3 hours for 15 qualified contacts
Response rate: 25-40%
Strategy #3: Content Engagement Path
- Post relevant content on LinkedIn
- See which decision makers engage (like, comment, share)
- Research their companies
- If company qualifies, reach out with context
- Reference their engagement in message
Time: Passive (builds over weeks)
Response rate: 40-60% (warm outreach)
Common LinkedIn Decision Maker Mistakes
Mistake #1: Contacting Everyone with Right Title
Wrong: Message 100 VPs without checking their companies
Right: Check if VP works at company matching your ICP
Mistake #2: Ignoring Company Context
Wrong: "Hi, I help marketing teams..."
Right: "Saw you're hiring 3 marketing roles—we help growing teams in [specific area]..."
Mistake #3: Not Verifying Authority
Wrong: Assume "Director" means decision maker
Right: Check how long in role, if they manage team, if they post about budget/strategy
Mistake #4: Targeting Too Senior or Too Junior
Wrong: Message CEOs of 500-person companies (won't respond) or Coordinators (can't decide)
Right: Target Directors and VPs at mid-market companies (decision authority + accessible)
Quick Decision Maker Qualification Checklist
Before contacting any LinkedIn decision maker:
Company qualified?
- ✓ Right size for your offer
- ✓ Right industry
- ✓ Active (posts/hiring within 90 days)
- ✓ Complete company profile
Person qualified?
- ✓ Title indicates authority (Director, VP, Head, Chief)
- ✓ In role 6+ months
- ✓ Active on LinkedIn (posts within 60 days)
- ✓ Profile shows progression to leadership
Reachable?
- ✓ Open to connections or posts publicly
- ✓ Engages with others' content
- ✓ Not overly senior (VP at 50-person company > CEO at 5,000-person company)
If all boxes checked: Contact with company-specific context
If company qualified but person unclear: Find different decision maker at same company
If company not qualified: Skip entirely, even if person seems perfect
Why Starting with Companies Saves Time
Person-first waste:
- Find perfect VP
- Research their background
- Craft personalized message
- Discover they work at 2-person startup (wrong size)
- Wasted 15 minutes
Company-first efficiency:
- Disqualify company in 2 minutes (too small)
- Never research any individuals there
- Saved 15+ minutes per wrong company
At 50 prospects: Company-first saves 5-8 hours by eliminating wrong companies before individual research begins.
Related Guides
LinkedIn Research Methods
- Why Company Pages Beat Personal Profiles (Company-first advantages)
- How Teams Use LinkedIn Company Pages (Research approaches)
Cross-Platform Decision Maker Research
- Universal Qualification Framework (Works everywhere)
- Finding Decision Makers on Google Maps (Local business owners)
- Agency Decision Maker Research on Clutch
Research Systems
- Company Qualification Before Contact (Reduce waste)
- Platform Comparison for B2B (When to use LinkedIn)
- All supported platforms


